Passive aggressive jabs are not appreciated.
Sorry about that. (I already changed the word from ... to months before I post to make it less aggressive.)
You posted 4 topics in one day, plus posts in other topics. Your topics are not ignored, we just have not gotten to them yet.
All my suggestions, issue report, discussion here only have one objective, to help make Spine became a better software no matter how they are presented. (either a direct advice or even comparing it with other software and see the pros and cons). Yes, I do made quite a number of post in the last few days. But that should not lead to my issue reports and suggestions being ignored. (I would say it is 'ignored' based on how fast other topics get their response. All the timestamps are recorded you can't lie about it) It just happen that I tried the beta and found some beta bugs, issues, design faults and have suggestions altogether in a short period of time. Just ask yourself if those topics are posted by different people, will your staff ignore them? What I want to say is, a profession staff should focus on the topic content (suggestion, idea or report) whether it is right or not, not the frequency of how the author post. IMO, all suggestions, issue reports, advice should have equal attention. Now, obviously my latest posts are being ignore. (sigh, I don't care anymore, this affect the quality of your software, not mine. Please keep ignoring them)
We have implemented features and made changes specifically for you. That you now complain you don't get enough attention is surprising.
I am also surprised on how you think about the situation. You seems like a little confused now. You are making features for your software. Please don't say its specifically for me. I am not the only one who want a particular feature. If I want a feature and I found such request exist in the forum, I would not post the same request too. No feature I requested is made specifically for me unless you write some code in Spine and make those feature only work for my account. Again, attention should be paid equally to to topic/content, not the user. If I filed 100 bug reports, are you going to say "Oh man, this guy is posting more than 10 topics in four days, let's start ignoring his topics."?
If your aim is to manipulate us into doing what you want, I can guarantee you that approach will not work.
My aim is to lead you guys to do what a busy spine user want. Please focus on the content and topic, not the approach that I use to present the demand. Should think critically whether what I want is also what other spine user want. If you evaluated the request and think that the request does not worth doing, no practical, not realistic or not good enough, and decide not to do it, I am fine with that. At least I tried my part of rising the issue or suggestion.
If anything, it will have the opposite effect.
Hmm....I can guarantee you this approach will not work. What I want is also what other people want, a better spine editor. e.g.those curve editor, x/y, separation, grouping, locking, etc. If anything (what does it even mean?), are you going to do the opposite and skip/delay those features? I can imagine the user base will suffer if you make things personal.
This is it. Although it is not a very good experience interacting in this forum, but I have to say thank you for making the Spine software. I don't want to continue this conversation anymore. It is a little sad and not very constructive and is against the intention of this topic.